Found 66 search results for keyword: found

This Interview was conducted in 1993 by U.S. revisionist Friedrich Paul Berg after Rudolf’s expert report had caused a stir in Germany.

An interview on occasion of Germar’s 50th birthday; published in: “Half a Century of Rebellion: Germar Rudolf Interviewed,” in: Smith’s Report, no. 211, December 2014, pp. 1f., 6f.

What exactly happened once Germar had been deported to Germany in 2005? There he faced criminal charges for his publishing activities abroad, although these activities had been perfectly legal there. How did he defend himself in court? Well, he fought like you would expect a courageous scholar to fight: He stood by his views, denied the German court any right to meddle into scientific affairs, and appealed to every fellow human to resist the oppressors! Here is a summary of his defense speech.

Here is the inside story of my 6-year lasting path through the obstacle course which the U.S. legal system has put up to separate the chaff from the wheat when it comes to asylum seekers. There is not much drama in this story spanning from 2000 to 2006, except maybe when I was arrested and deported in 2005. But the hostile partisan attitude of the U.S. officials involved – both prosecutors and judges – is quite revealing.

“Hunting Germar Rudolf” could also be the title of this paper, because that’s what was going on back in 1999, when the British media unleashed a manhunt for me. I wrote this essay shortly before applying for political asylum in the U.S. One of the questions I had to answer when filing the application was something like “Describe exactly how you came into this country.” Well, that’s what I did. It ended up being a 20 some odd pages essay, which my lawyer said I shouldn’t file. I ended up filing a 15 line short version of this story instead.

This is the essay that describes how the forces of persecution were unleashed against me. It describes the beginning of an ordeal that many people ignorant of the truth think I deserved, but those who know what has happened are truly shocked and appalled. Discover for yourself what a society can do to a scientist who merely tries to get the facts straight and out into the open.

This essay follows my steps from first learning about revisionism to getting actively involved by accepting to prepare a chemical expert report for a court case. It’s a gathering storm…

This essay traces the events that got me started: to think the impossible, to challenge the taboo – first of all the one in my own head.

An insatiable curiosity, the will to know and to find out, is what has always driven me. This essay looks into this character feature of mine starting from when I was a little boy.

This is an essay about my father and me. Some say that, in order to judge a man, you need to know what relationship he has (or had) with his father. I do not entirely agree with that, but I admit freely that my past relationship with my father has something to do with my involvement in revisionism.